U.S. government moves to break up google, sparking concerns over tech monopoly

In a historic move reminiscent of the AT&T breakup in 1982, the U.S. government is considering break up on the Google, one of the world’s largest tech companies. On October 8, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed court documents advocating for a split of Google’s core businesses, separating its search engine from its other platforms, including Android, Chrome, and the Google Play Store.

The DOJ alleges that Google has violated U.S. antitrust laws, claiming the company has leveraged its dominance in search to stifle competition. The court filing asserts that breaking up Google “would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search and Google search-related products and features—including emerging search access points and features, such as artificial intelligence—over rivals or new entrants.”

This move follows a significant ruling in August that labeled Google a “monopolist,” igniting a legal battle that could reshape the landscape of technology companies in the United States. In response, Google has mounted a robust defense, characterizing the government’s recommendations as radical and potentially detrimental to consumer experience.

Also Read:Blinken warns ASEAN of China’s ‘dangerous’ actions in Sea disputes

In a recent blog post, Google argued, “This case is about a set of search distribution contracts. Rather than focus on that, the government seems to be pursuing a sweeping agenda that will impact numerous industries and products, with significant unintended consequences for consumers, businesses, and American competitiveness.” The company also warned that breaking up its operations could compromise user privacy by necessitating the sharing of personal information with competitors.

During the hearings, the government emphasized that Google employed various tactics to maintain its monopoly, effectively limiting consumer choice among search engines. Central to the case are contracts with tech giants like Apple, where Google invested billions to become the default search provider on smartpho

Qnes. Judge Amit Mehta ruled these contracts were anticompetitive, further complicating Google’s defense.

Now, as Google appeals Mehta’s ruling, the company faces additional scrutiny from the DOJ and 17 states over allegations of anti-competitive practices related to its advertising services. The outcome of this legal saga could redefine the tech industry’s competitive landscape, raising questions about the future of market dominance and consumer choice.