JD Vance defends controversial claims about Haitian immigrants, escalating tensions in Springfield

Ohio Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance on Sunday defended his controversial statements about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, despite the lack of evidence supporting his claims.

In an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Vance reiterated baseless accusations that Haitian immigrants were involved in eating pets, a claim widely disputed by local officials and experts.

When pressed by CNN’s Dana Bash for evidence, Vance cited unspecified “firsthand accounts” from constituents, though no concrete proof was provided. “The American media totally ignored this stuff until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes,” Vance argued. “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do.”

Also Read: Italy: Deputy PM Matteo Salvini faces jail time for controversial migrant boat standoff

Bash countered Vance’s claims, highlighting that he had admitted to creating a narrative to attract media attention. Vance responded, asserting that while he did not create the immigrant influx, his focus on these issues was meant to spotlight what he believes are the consequences of current policies.

Local officials in Springfield have denounced these rumors. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine firmly rejected the claims, stating, “No. Absolutely not,” and praised the Haitian immigrants for their positive impact on the community. Springfield Mayor Rob Rue criticized the perpetuation of false claims, noting the increased threats and disruptions faced by the city, including a recent bomb threat that led to the temporary closure of city hall and evacuations at local schools and hospitals.

In response to the escalating situation, Vance denied any link between his rhetoric and the threats against Springfield’s facilities. “There is nothing that I have said that has led to threats against these hospitals,” he insisted. He maintained that his remarks were intended to reflect the concerns of his constituents about immigration policies, even as the controversy continues to fuel local tensions.

Governor DeWine acknowledged the challenges posed by the influx of immigrants, noting ongoing efforts to address the issues. Meanwhile, Vance defended his stance, asserting that addressing his constituents’ complaints, however contentious, is part of his role as a public representative.